Criminal Case Digest: PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES vs. FRANCISCO DACILLO AND JOSELITO PACOT y IBARRA


G.R. No. 149368. April 14, 2004
PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES vs. FRANCISCO DACILLO AND JOSELITO PACOT y IBARRA
Criminal Case Digest
Digested Cases
Criminal Law 


Facts:
Jovelyn Dagmil saw the victim, Rosemarie B. Tallada, enter the house of the accused Francisco Dacillo, where she was last seen alive. Moments later Jovelyn and several others heard a struggle that took place in the house but failed to report the same immediately to the police. Five days later the foul odor of the victim’s rotting body was emitted from the house of the accused to which they decided to call the police. Upon closer investigation, they found the body of the victim encased in a cement tomb in the home of the accused who was only arrested a year after the discovery of the body. He was found guilty of the crime of murder and sentenced to death due to the aggravating circumstance of recidivism for a previous conviction for the death of his former live-in partner. Joselito Pacot, who he claimed killed the victim, was acquitted for lack of sufficient evidence to identify him with certainty.

Issue:
Whether the aggravating circumstance of recidivism should have been appreciated by the court against the accused

Ruling:
In order to appreciate recidivism as an aggravating circumstance, it is necessary to allege it in the information and to attach certified true copies of the sentences previously meted out to the accused. The aggravating circumstance of recidivism was not alleged in the information and therefore cannot be appreciated against appellant. Hence the imposable penalty should be reduced to reclusion perpetua.


Post a Comment (0)
Previous Post Next Post