Criminal Case Digest: People vs Jaranilla, 55 SCRA 563

People vs Jaranilla, 55 SCRA 563

Criminal Case Digest:
Digested Cases

Facts:
The case is an appeal of the defendants Elias Jaranilla, Ricardo Suyo, and Franco Brillantes from the decision of the Court of First Instance of Ilo-ilo which convicted the accused of robbery and with homicide, and sentenced each of them to Reclusion Perpetua and ordered the accused to pay solidarily the sum of six thousand pesos to the heirs of Ramonito Jabatan and the sum of five hundred pesos to Valentin Baylon as the value of five fighting cocks.
It should also be noted that the accsued, Elias Jaranilla, has escaped from the provincial jail and no record shows that he has been appreheanded.
Issue:
WON defendants Suyo and Brillantes are liable as co principal in the crime of Homicide.
Held:
The killing of the peace officer is characterized as homicide because the act was made during the spur of the moment and the treacherous mode of attack was not consciously or deliberately adopted by the offender. In addition, only persons who perpetrated the killing is responsible for such action. Furthermore, mere presence in the crime scene does not necessarily make a person co-principal thereof.
Hence, only the accused, Elias Jaranilla, who perpetrated the killing is responsible and liable for robbery and homicide. The co-accused, Suyo and Brillantes, are convicted of theft. Therefore, the decision of the lower court is reversed and sentenced the accused, Ricardo Suyo and Franco Brillantes, as co-principals in the crime of theft.

No promulgation as to the accused, Elias Jaranilla, that being stated that the accused has escaped from the provincial jail.


Post a Comment (0)
Previous Post Next Post