Constitutional Law: US vs. Ling Su Fan, 10 Phil 104

US vs. Ling Su Fan, 10 Phil 104

Facts:
Defendant, Ling Su Fan, is accused of attempting to export Philippine silver coins from the Philippines contrary to Act No. 1411 of the Philippine Commission. His defenses, among others, involved the deprivation of due process due to the confiscation of the coins.

Held:
...phrase "due process of law" was defined by Judge Story, in his work on Constitutional Law, as " the law in its regular course of administration through the courts of justice."
Due process of law in each particular case means such an exertion of the powers of the government as the settled maxims of law permit and sanction, and under such safeguards for the protection of individual rights as those maxims prescribed for the class of cases to which the one in question belongs. Judge Cooley, in his work on Constitutional Limitations, says:
"Due process of law" is process or proceedings according to the law of the land. "Due process of law" is not that the law shal l be according to the wishes of all the inhabitants of the state, but simply — First. That there shall be a law prescribed in harmony with the general powers of the legislative department of the Government
Second. That this law shall be reasonable in its operation;
Third. That it shall be enforced according to the regular methods of procedure prescribed; and
Fourth. That it shall be applicable alike to all the citizens of the state or to all of a class.

Lower court's decision was affirmed convicting him guilty with costs against him
Post a Comment (0)
Previous Post Next Post