G.R.
Nos. 118013-14 October
11, 1995
PEOPLE
OF THE PHILIPPINES
vs.
HON. DEMOSTHENES L. MAGALLANES, as Presiding Judge of the Regional Trial Court, Branch 54, Bacolod City, and P/COL. NICOLAS M. TORRES, P/INSP. ADONIS C. ABETO, PO MARIO LAMIS Y FERNANDEZ, PO JOSE PAHAYUPAN, PO VICENTE CANUDAY, JR., JEANETTE YANSON-DUMANCAS, CHARLES DUMANCAS, DOMINADOR GEROCHE Y MAHUSAY, JAIME GARGALLANO, ROLANDO R. FERNANDEZ, EDWIN DIVINAGRACIA, TEODY DELGADO, CESAR PECHA,
vs.
HON. DEMOSTHENES L. MAGALLANES, as Presiding Judge of the Regional Trial Court, Branch 54, Bacolod City, and P/COL. NICOLAS M. TORRES, P/INSP. ADONIS C. ABETO, PO MARIO LAMIS Y FERNANDEZ, PO JOSE PAHAYUPAN, PO VICENTE CANUDAY, JR., JEANETTE YANSON-DUMANCAS, CHARLES DUMANCAS, DOMINADOR GEROCHE Y MAHUSAY, JAIME GARGALLANO, ROLANDO R. FERNANDEZ, EDWIN DIVINAGRACIA, TEODY DELGADO, CESAR PECHA,
and
EDGAR HILADO
FACTS:
Two informations for kidnapping for ransom with
murder were filed in the Regional Trial Court of Bacolod City against fourteen
persons, five of whom are members of the Philippine National Police. The two
cases was consolidated.
While the trial was on going, the prosecution file a
motion for the transmittal of the case to the Sandiganbayan on the ground that
the trial court has no jurisdiction over the cases because the offense charged
were committed in relation to the office of the accused PNP officers.
ISSUE:
Whether or not the crimes charged falls under the
jurisdiction of the Sandiganbayan.
HELD:
No, the case is no longer
cognizable by the Sandiganbayan.
Ordinarily, jurisdiction once
acquired is not affected by subsequent legislative enactment placing
jurisdiction in another tribunal. It remains with the court until the case is
finally terminated. Hence, the
Sandiganbayan or the courts, as the case may be, cannot be divested of
jurisdiction over cases filed before them by reason of R.A. No. 7975. They
retain their jurisdiction until the end of the litigation.
In
the instant case, the Sandiganbayan has not yet acquired jurisdiction over the
subject criminal cases, as the informations were filed not before it but before
the Regional Trial Court. Even if we labor under the foregoing assumption that
the informations in the subject cases do charge the respondent PNP officers
with offenses committed in relation to their office so that jurisdiction
thereof would fall under the Sandiganbayan, and assuming further that the
informations had already been filed with the said tribunal but hearing thereon
has not begun yet, the Sandiganbayan can no longer proceed to hear the cases in
view of the express provision of Section 7 of R.A. No. 7975. That section
provides that upon the effectivity of the Act, all criminal cases in which
trial has not yet begun in the Sandiganbayan shall be referred to the proper
courts. Hence, cases which were previously cognizable by the Sandiganbayan
under P.D. No. 1606, as amended, but are already under the jurisdiction of the
courts by virtue of the amendment introduced by R.A. No. 7975, shall be
referred to the latter courts if hearing thereon has not yet been commenced in
the Sandiganbayan.
It
would, therefore, be a futile exercise to transfer the cases to the
Sandiganbayan because the same would anyway be transferred again to the
Regional Trial Court pursuant to Section 7 of the new law in relation to
Section 2 thereof.